Are You Willing?
Psalms 81:10-16
Recently I someone asked a question about Matthew 23:37 in which Jesus said, “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!” This question concerned the ability of man to decide to believe in Christ. Is salvation a matter of the will in making a pure rational decision of the mind, or is man incapable of choosing Christ because of the depravity of his will? Still another way of asking is, “Was the will of man debilitated by the fall to the extent he is spiritually incapacitated?” These questions are important because they address the ordo salutis (order of salvation).
This is an interesting query that would take quite a bit of time to explore fully. There is an interesting parallel to Jesus’ words in Psalm 81. The parallelism helps to explain what Jesus meant. His lament over Jerusalem is identical in thought to God’s plea for Israel in verses 10-16: “I am the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt: open thy mouth wide, and I will fill it. But my people would not hearken to my voice; and Israel would none of me. So I gave them up unto their own hearts’ lust: and they walked in their own counsels. Oh that my people had hearkened unto me, and Israel had walked in my ways! I should soon have subdued their enemies, and turned my hand against their adversaries. The haters of the LORD should have submitted themselves unto him: but their time should have endured for ever. He should have fed them also with the finest of the wheat: and with honey out of the rock should I have satisfied thee.”
Notice the parallels: “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee.” This corresponds to “Oh that my people had hearkened unto me, and Israel had walked in my ways!” How did God speak to Israel? He spoke through the same prophets that Jesus said they killed. Jesus said, “How often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings.” This speaks of His power of protection which is echoed by God’s words: ”I should soon have subdued their enemies, and turned my hand against their adversaries.”
The response of Israel in both cases was “They would not.” It is clear in the Old Testament that God is speaking of the temporal blessings Israel would have enjoyed in the establishment of her kingdom as the dominant government in the world. He would have filled His people with everything they needed (v. 10), but Israel would not listen (v. 11). In the context of Matthew 23, Jesus speaks the same. The result of Israel’s rejection, specifically the rejection of the religious rulers, was the destruction of Jerusalem and the loss of any significant role for Israel until the Second Advent. Christ did not begin His earthly kingdom during the First Advent because Israel rejected their Messiah King.
The importance of this interpretation of scripture is to show the will of man in salvation is not under consideration in this passage. It is critical to keep scripture in context rather than wresting it from its context to support mistaken doctrines. It is far better to examine scriptures that are without doubt dealing with the question at hand. For example John 1:13: “Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.” Does anyone have an issue interpreting this to be a salvation verse? Another is John 5:40: “And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life.” Is salvation a matter of the will? Most certainly, and nothing is clearer than “Ye will not come to me.” How can this verse be cast positively to argue that man’s will enables him to come when Jesus said you will not come?
There is neither time nor space to explore this question in depth. A little reading in John chapter 6 would certainly further our understanding of the matter. It is wise for every Bible student to be sure to keep scripture in context lest you run afoul of its plain declarations.
Pastor V. Mark Smith